Chris

Peter is upset by what his wife said and is trying to prove how the way he acts is acceptable. The audience is Peter's wife and family Ethos. It is an emotional speech which you can tell by the tone and expressions of Peter and his Wife The argument seems to be effective. His wife looks sad and like she feels bad afterwards making it seem like he proved his point to his wife. The speech was pretty well said and not much could have been changed to strengthen it if anything.
 * What is the purpose of the speech? Provide a brief statement of context**
 * The purpose is**
 * Who is the audience?**
 * Which appeal (ethos, pathos, logos) is most prevalent? How do you know?**
 * Is the argument effective? Were any logical fallacies used?**
 * How could the argument have been strengthened?**

media type="youtube" key="adc3MSS5Ydc" height="315" width="420" This video is meant to show satire towards presidential campaign and how billions of dollars are spent for no reason. It talks about how they will promise anything to the people to get a vote. They talk bad about the other candidates and do whatever they need to to win the election. This is shown in the video through song and dance by the different candidates from the last elections. Through out the video the all come in one by one singing about what it might have been they said during the campaign. The video really just makes fun of them and makes it seem like what they do to get a vote is just dumb. They do a good job of actually including true information in the the satire part of the video.