S24

Write an analysis of the speech.
 * 1) What is the purpose of the speech? Provide a brief statement of context.
 * 2) Who is the audience?
 * 3) Which appeal (ethos, pathos, logos) is most prevalent? How do you know?
 * 4) Is the argument effective? Were any logical fallacies used?
 * 5) How could the argument have been strengthened?
 * 6) media type="custom" key="25158264"

1)The purpose of the speech is to persuade the audience that going to school and receiving an education aren't the same. It shows that success and education aren't derived from a person going to school. Education is lot different than the way society views it.he argues that a test score or GPA doesn't determine what a person is capable of doing with their life. 2) Everyone, but primarily Americans. 3)All three are prevalent, but probably logos. He uses logic to show how what is accepted today as the only way to do things might be completely wrong, but no one ever questions it. He uses facts and speaks of renowned figures in history. 4)The argument is extremely effective, and I did not find any logical fallacies outside of the fact that the extremely successful individuals he used are a very small minority of those who drop out of school. 5) The argument could have been strengthened by more use of examples of everyday people.