Tori

media type="youtube" key="HaUf5LntRvk" height="315" width="560"


 * 1) **What is the purpose of the speech?** Andrea is trying to get it through Dale's head that him "saving" her from the CDC explosion (previous season) was wrong and not what she wanted. She is trying to tell him to quit worrying about her because she's not his problem.
 * 2) **Who is the audience?** Dale
 * 3) **Which appeal (ethos, pathos, logos) is most prevalent? How do you know?** I believe this speech has a combination of pathos and logos. She is trying to persuade Dale into not worrying about her by also using logic.
 * 4) **Is the argument effective? Were any logical fallacies used?** The argument... Was taken into consideration. Dale is the type of guy who looks after everyone no matter what. Otherwise, Andrea would have died in the said explosion. As for fallacies, the argument began as Dale not wanting to give her the gun, then progressed into Dale's decision to save her at the CDC being wrong.
 * 5) **How could the argument have been strengthened?** I think Andrea had a strong argument. She had her points and she backed them up with logical reasoning.